Change Text Size
Email Columns Print page
Columns: The Online newspaper for the University of Georgia community
Show Index
October 3, 2016   Columns Articles | Inside UGA | UGA scientists lead team developing test for Chagas…
Magnify Tarleton, Rick-Research2012
Rick Tarleton Photo by Andrew Tucker

UGA scientists lead team developing test for Chagas disease

Donna Huber

Manager of publicity and development, Center for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases

Recent and archived articles by Donna Huber


Work: 706-542-3378
Email:
By Donna Huber | October 3, 2016
Share    

An international team of researchers, led by UGA infectious disease experts, has received $5.2 million from the National Institutes of Health to develop a more accurate, affordable diagnostic test for Chagas disease. The parasitic infection kills more than 50,000 people each year in Central and South America.

Caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi and spread by blood-feeding insects commonly known as "kissing bugs," Chagas disease is considered by many to be the most neglected of the neglected tropical diseases. While it is endemic to Latin America, Chagas disease is a growing threat in the U.S. and Europe.

Currently, there are only two drug treatments available; however, their usage is limited due to severe adverse reactions and the length of treatment required.

"Fortunately, there are a number of new drug discovery efforts in Chagas disease. But a major limitation is the difficulty in comparing the relative efficacy of current drugs to newly developed ones," said Rick Tarleton, UGA Athletic Association Distinguished Research Professor of Biological Sciences in the cellular biology department and the Center for Tropical and Emerging Global Diseases. "One simply can't wait for 10 years, as current protocols require, to determine if a new drug is better than the existing ones."

In Chagas disease, the number of parasites in chronically infected individuals is extremely low, making detection of parasites an unreliable test to determine if an individual is infected. Instead, the researchers have focused on the body's response to infection by measuring the unique antibodies that the immune system creates in response to exposure to T. cruzi.

Tarleton and his colleagues already have developed a successful multiplex blood test that measures antibodies to multiple T. cruzi proteins. While their test has proven to be useful in the laboratory, it is also expensive.

The primary goal of their current project is to make the test more sensitive by expanding the number of T. cruzi antibodies it can detect. But the researchers also are developing techniques to make the test more affordable so that it can be used in diagnostic centers in endemic countries.

"By monitoring a broader range of immune responses, we can achieve a rapid and reliable detection of changes in these responses after treatment," Tarleton said. "And moving from the current bead-based assay to an array platform makes the reagents and the detector for reading the assay much more affordable."

The "gold standard" for determining a cure is for a patient to convert from seropositive to seronegative, meaning that a blood test does not detect any T. cruzi antibodies. The conventional blood test requires a minimum of 24 months to show a decline in antibody response, and complete conversion to a negative blood test can take up to 10 years.

Over the past 12 years, the Tarleton laboratory and the laboratory of CONICET research scientist Susana Laucella in Argentina have shown antibodies tested by the multiplex method are potential surrogate indicators of treatment success. They believe this method will detect significant decline in antibody levels in less than 12 months.

To more rapidly determine treatment success, the project also will investigate other potential markers of patients being cured, including antibodies to carbohydrate epitopes and changes in the numbers of plasmablasts, the cells that secrete antibodies.

"We are looking for the earliest signs of treatment efficacy," Tarleton said. "As parasite numbers are reduced due to treatment, we expect, based on data from other systems, that one of the first detectable changes will be in the immune cells that are responding to the presence of parasites and producing antibodies, the plasmablasts."

The researchers also will be exploring the phenomenon of spontaneous cure, a cure in the absence of treatment, as only anecdotal information is currently available.

"The immune response to T. cruzi infection is actually very strong and as a result, spontaneous cure occurs," Tarleton said. "However, the frequency of cure without treatment is not known, nor are methods available that discriminate between those with active, chronic infections and those who have cured."

Approximately 20 percent of individuals receive mixed results from conventional blood tests for T. cruzi infection. This is a large number of potentially infected people to leave untreated. However, current therapies have such severe side effects that doctors often do not prescribe them. Understanding why some individuals can "cure themselves" could lead to new treatments for the disease.

More from this issue

FOR MORE ONLINE
UGA
Columns is produced by the University of Georgia | Division of Marketing & Communications | Feedback